After reading this proposed rule, I disagree with this rule to an extent. I am not in support of this rule because I believe this rule should differentiated from the different offenders. Someone who simply urinated in public, should not have this dark cloud following them for the rest of their lives. Putting them in the same category as people who have done truly disgusting things. For this rule to be affective their needs to be requirements for the offender, not just any offender. Someone with a lighter offence just should not face the same fate. This could potentially ruin lives, just think about this what if they were wrongly convicted? This must be kept in mind, not every time is someone rightfully convicted.

(20 / 1)
The opinions expressed within posts and comments are solely those of each author, and are not necessarily those of Women Against Registry. Women Against Registry reserves the right to edit or delete any content submitted.
Leave a comment.