Harsh treatment of people who committed a sex offense is based on flawed social science

Robert Longo, the author of the 1986 Psychology Today article that was cited in the SCOTUS case: Smith v Doe 2003, as the source of the false “frightening and high” statistic, refutes his 1986 claim that the SCOTUS relied on.

In the video 1:20 – 3:08 regarding the 1986 Psychology Today article, Robert Longo now says:

“That’s Absolutely Incorrect”
“Its, … Its Wrong”
“Its, … Its not true”
“If you’re going to base laws at a federal level, you don’t cite popular psychology magazines no matter who the author is, me or anybody else. Its not a scientific journal. I’m appalled that this could happen. This is not my intent, not my intent at all.”





(35 / 1)
The opinions expressed within posts and comments are solely those of each author, and are not necessarily those of Women Against Registry. Women Against Registry reserves the right to edit or delete any content submitted.
Leave a comment.