Comment Sexual registries are unconstitutional. There are no enumerated powers for the federal government or state governments to require any American to register for anything unless they are under state custody of a sentence. Under the 13th
Read MoreComment See attached file(s) Due to my comment being lengthy, I have attached a document. It describes by SORNA should be abolished and a sensible plan enacted, in order to give those released from prison a
Read MoreComment These Registries and the Rules need to end , This is not Ok in anyway it effects so many families and young adults for a life time of shaming, humiliation, struggles they can never be equal,
Read MoreComment It seems to me that this lengthy document imposes additional regulation, obligation, and limitation for those who have to register. It appears to be an organization tool of sorts; a way to equalize and centralize registration
Read MoreComment This is contrary to what some states (I am most familiar with Washington) that have not adopted SORNA because they have a better system, using actuarial risk assessments to determine notification levels. Furthermore, these systems allow
Read MoreComment 1st off I have never met anyone who has been on the registry who was not changed. Also not one person on these lists are a threat to society. Before the inmate leaves prison to be
Read MoreComment The sex offender registry came about as a product of several horrific, high-profile child abductions and murders. After two and a half decades, there has NEVER been a shred of evidence that the sex offender registry
Read MoreComment I oppose this proposed regulation. The addition of more regulations to an already overly burdensome, punitive, and ineffectual sex offender registry system will not protect children, but instead ensure that more people are placed on the
Read MoreComment The sex offender registry is a complete failure. The intention behind it may have had some good intentions but the registry is ineffective in meeting and providing improved public safety. Instead it provides a false sense
Read MoreComment This entire document — in fact, the entire sex offender registration system — is predicated on the false assumption that an individual who has previously committed a sex-based offense at some point in their history is
Read MoreComment This proposal is an unfortunate set of circumstances. It has Epstein written all over it! To begin with this is ALL political and will get passed, for sure. Yes its wrong, yes IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL but
Read MoreComment How is of this “Justice” The justice departments own studies shows that ” sexoffenders” the lowest rates of recitism of any other type of “criminal”. I was convicted in Alabama. for RAPE 2nd.. ( sounds bad
Read MoreComment Why expand a failed system? Very few states comply with these regulations, and the utility of the entire SORNA program has been proven to be unnecessary, draconian, and unconstitutional. Recidivism rates for these crimes are
Read MoreComment State laws have adequately protected the public for many years. This rule change would somehow subject people, whose state convictions no longer require them to register, whom judges have found adequately rehabilitated to permit them not
Read MoreComment As someone who works in risk-mitigation with people who have committed sexual offenses, what about this Act incorporates research about the risk for sexual recidivism? I work primarily in the forensic evaluation of people charged
Read MoreComment Ex post facto as well as due process are greatly ignored for sex offender registry. There are a number of disproportional impacted people with mental health as well as youth on the registry. I personally
Read MoreComment There has been substantial data provided that registration and the rules involved do more harm than good. The majority of sex offenders affected are not pedophiles or rapists. Though this is what the public believes. The
Read MoreComment The Regustry is an absolute bureaucratic system. It tangles and snags any chance of redemption. registration handicaps rehabilitation and damages families, children are bullied when parents are listed. Publicly. There’s little value to the public
Read MoreComment I am greatly concerned about the change regarding how a registrant is to update work and/or school information. While it may work for someone whose employer or school is nearby, it fails to take into account
Read More
Women Against Registry Family Foundation.
We will receive .5% of your total purchase as a donation from amazon.
If you want to shop at amazon, please shop at
smile.amazon.com/ch/47-4076038
Our organizations, Women Against Registry and WAR Family Foundation, do not support or condone illegal sexual activity based on state and federal laws, to include child or adult sex trafficking. We are not and have never been affiliated with any organizations that promote, support or condone sex between adults and minors.
Recent Comments